← Back to Blog

Short answer: The best Fireflies.ai alternative for Mac users is Voice Keyboard Pro's Meeting Mode. It takes AI meeting notes with speaker detection directly on your Mac, so no recording bot joins the call, and no audio or transcript content is ever stored on a server.

Fireflies.ai is one of the most widely used AI meeting assistants, and if you have taken a video call in the last two years you have almost certainly seen its notetaker sitting in a participant list. It records the meeting, transcribes it, and produces summaries and action items that land in your workspace afterward. For teams that want a searchable archive of every call, it does that job well.

And yet "Fireflies alternative" is a search people run constantly. The reasons are remarkably consistent, and most of them trace back to a single design decision: Fireflies works by sending a bot into your meeting. This post looks honestly at what that tradeoff costs, who should keep using a bot-based recorder, and why a growing group of people are switching to tools that take notes without joining the call, including Voice Keyboard Pro's Meeting Mode on the Mac.

What Fireflies.ai Actually Does Well

A fair comparison starts with credit where it is due. Fireflies sends an AI notetaker into meetings on the major platforms (Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and others), records the call, and turns it into a transcript with summaries, action items, and search. Because the transcripts live in a shared workspace, teams can build a collective memory: a sales manager can review calls they never attended, a new hire can read the last month of project syncs, and anyone can search across every recorded conversation for the moment a decision was made.

If your organization genuinely needs that, a verbatim, shared, searchable archive of meetings across a whole team, bot-based recording is the design that delivers it, and Fireflies is a competent implementation. The same is true of its closest neighbors in the category; our Otter.ai alternative guide covers that landscape in more depth.

Why People Go Looking for an Alternative

1. The bot changes the meeting

The moment "Fireflies.ai Notetaker" appears in the participant list, the meeting is different. Everyone can see it. Some people visibly choose their words more carefully. Candid asides get saved for after the call. Anyone who has watched a colleague say "let's take that offline" while glancing at the recorder knows the effect is real. A tool meant to capture the conversation ends up subtly flattening it.

2. The consent moment is awkward, and sometimes it is a blocker

Recording a meeting is not a neutral act. Depending on where participants live, recording conversations can require consent from everyone on the call, and even where it is legally simple, it is socially loaded. With external participants (clients, candidates, prospects) the calculus gets worse: you are asking someone you are trying to win over to agree to be recorded by a third-party service they have never heard of. Plenty of companies now block unknown bots from joining their meetings outright, which means your notetaker sometimes simply does not get in.

3. Your conversations accumulate in someone else's cloud

A bot recorder works by capturing the full audio of your meeting and storing the recording and transcript in your account on the vendor's servers. That is the product working as designed, not a flaw. But it means the most sensitive conversations in your working life (pricing strategy, personnel discussions, legal questions, candid customer feedback) accumulate, verbatim, in a cloud archive. Every security review you go through will ask about it. For some teams the answer is fine. For a lot of individuals, it is more standing risk than a set of meeting notes is worth.

4. It only does meetings

Fireflies is a meeting tool. On days with no meetings, it does nothing for you. Meanwhile the writing that surrounds meetings (the agenda beforehand, the follow-up email, the task descriptions, the message to the person who missed it) is still all typed by hand. A meeting assistant that only exists inside the meeting leaves most of the actual work untouched.

The Bot-Free Approach

There is a different way to build a meeting notes tool: instead of sending a participant into the call to record it, run quietly on the computer you are already taking the call from, and take notes there. Nothing joins the meeting. Nothing appears in the participant list. The other people on the call experience exactly what they would if you were taking notes by hand, except you are not, because the software is doing it.

This is the approach Voice Keyboard Pro takes with Meeting Mode on the Mac, and it is the same no-bot philosophy behind tools we compared in our Granola alternative guide. Here is what it looks like in practice:

For a step-by-step walkthrough of Meeting Mode, see our full guide to meeting transcription on Mac.

The Privacy Difference Is Structural

This is the part that deserves plain language, because it is the deepest difference between the two designs and it cannot be patched over with settings.

A bot-based recorder must, by its architecture, ship your meeting audio to the vendor's cloud and keep the transcript there; the shared searchable archive that makes the product valuable is that stored data. With Voice Keyboard Pro, the server stores only operational pings. No audio is stored on the server, and no transcript content is stored on the server. Your meeting notes end up on your Mac, in your documents and your follow-up emails, not in a third-party archive that grows by every conversation you have.

Neither design is dishonest. They are different bets about what a meeting tool owes you. One bets that the archive is worth the accumulation. The other bets that your conversations are yours, and the tool's job is to hand you the notes and get out of the way. If you have ever hesitated before discussing something sensitive because a notetaker was in the room, you already know which bet you prefer.

The Part Nobody Mentions: The Other 90% of Your Writing Day

Here is the practical argument that ends up mattering most day to day. A meeting recorder earns its keep only while a meeting is happening. Voice Keyboard Pro is a voice-to-text tool for your entire Mac, and Meeting Mode is one feature of it.

The core of the app is system-wide dictation: hold a hotkey, speak, release, and the text appears at your cursor in whatever app you are using. People speak at 130 to 150 words per minute and most people type at around 40, so the meeting follow-up email that would take eight minutes to type takes two to say. The agenda goes into the calendar invite by voice. The action items go into your task manager by voice. The Slack update to the person who missed the meeting is spoken, not typed. Smart Vocabulary (a personal dictionary with replacement rules) keeps client names, product names, and jargon spelled right across all of it.

So the comparison is not really "which meeting tool is better." It is a meeting archive that sits idle between calls versus a writing tool you use fifty times a day that also handles your meetings. On an iPhone, the same product is a keyboard with a built-in mic button, with Voice Edit to fix text by speaking the change and two-way translation across 24 languages while you dictate, so the capture habit follows you off the desk.

Honest Reasons to Stay With Fireflies

A comparison you can trust has to include the cases where the incumbent wins. Keep a bot-based recorder if:

If none of those describe you (if you are one person who wants good notes from your own meetings without a chaperone in every call), the bot is overhead you do not need.

Fireflies.ai vs. Voice Keyboard Pro at a Glance

One Etiquette Note

Bot-free does not mean ethics-free. The visible bot, for all its awkwardness, is its own disclosure: everyone knows notes are being taken. When the tool is invisible, that courtesy becomes your job. A simple "I'm taking notes on my end, I'll send a summary after" costs you nothing, keeps trust intact, and is a good habit regardless of what software you use. Know the recording and note-taking norms that apply to you, especially for external calls.

How to Try the Switch

  1. Download Voice Keyboard Pro for Mac and grant it microphone access.
  2. Leave your Fireflies setup untouched for now; this is a trial, not a migration.
  3. For your next meeting, start Meeting Mode (or let calendar meeting detection catch it) and take the call normally.
  4. Afterward, compare: did the AI notes with speaker detection capture the decisions and action items you actually needed? Was anything missing that the bot's archive would have given you?
  5. Then try the rest of the product: dictate the follow-up email, speak the action items into your task manager, and see what a voice-first day feels like.

Run that experiment for a week of meetings. Most people discover that what they wanted all along was not an archive of everything ever said; it was good notes, no awkward bot, and their conversations staying theirs.

The Bottom Line

Fireflies.ai is a solid product for teams that need a shared, searchable recording archive and accept a bot in every call as the price. But if what you actually want is AI meeting notes for yourself, with speaker detection, without a recorder in the participant list, and without your conversations piling up in someone else's cloud, then the bot was never a feature. It was a workaround. Voice Keyboard Pro's Meeting Mode takes the notes on your Mac, keeps the content off servers entirely, and comes with a system-wide dictation tool that keeps working long after the meeting ends. The free tier is enough to test it on your very next call.

Keep reading